{"id":1083,"date":"2017-07-14T17:53:12","date_gmt":"2017-07-15T00:53:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angryweasel.com\/blog\/?p=1083"},"modified":"2017-07-14T17:55:07","modified_gmt":"2017-07-15T00:55:07","slug":"a-call-to-action-lets-fix-the-wikipedia-page-on-software-testing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angryweasel.com\/blog\/a-call-to-action-lets-fix-the-wikipedia-page-on-software-testing\/","title":{"rendered":"A call to action: let&#8217;s fix the Wikipedia page on software testing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Today, I had a few minutes, and wanted to try, yet again, to make some positive change to the article on <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Software_testing\">software testing on wikipedia<\/a><\/p>\n<p>I failed. It&#8217;s a mess, and I don&#8217;t know where to start. It&#8217;s too long. It&#8217;s unorganized. Many \/ most of the citations are a decade or more old. Some blanket statements are un-cited (and arguably false). Other citations point to non-peer reviewed conference presentations. At best, some citations are from books 20 years old. Software testing has changed, but the entire article represents antiquated methods of testing. I recognize that many teams test this way, but the article fails to recognize many other testing approaches.<\/p>\n<p>@noahsussman attempted to clean a large chunk of the article, but it was blindly (mostly blindly) rejected. He needs help, but I&#8217;m not sure how to help him by myself. I don&#8217;t know what the new article should look like, but I want to be a part of creating it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>My first challenge<\/strong> for you is to go <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Software_testing\">read the article<\/a> from beginning to end. If things don&#8217;t sit well, read the citations. Try to make sense of it. Then come back here and tell me if you&#8217;re as frustrated (or as embarrassed) as I am. Compare it with the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Software_development\">article on software development<\/a> if it helps.<\/p>\n<p><strong>My second challenge<\/strong> is for you to join the cause to fix it. Send me a DM on twitter (@alanpage) &#8211; or send me an email (this domain &#8211; alan), and I&#8217;ll add you to a <a href=\"https:\/\/swtestwikipedia.slack.com\">slack group<\/a> where we can discuss strategy, share thoughts, and figure out how to modify this article so it makes sense to all of us &#8211; and that it&#8217;s an article we all feel can represent the current definition and state of software testing.<\/p>\n<p>To be clear, I think there&#8217;s some value buried in the current page, but I think it can be much, much better. If you agree, come help me (and if I can get him re-involved, help Noah as well).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Today, I had a few minutes, and wanted to try, yet again, to make some positive change to the article on software testing on wikipedia I failed. It&#8217;s a mess, and I don&#8217;t know where to start. It&#8217;s too long. It&#8217;s unorganized. Many \/ most of the citations are a decade or more old. Some&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1083","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allposts"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/angryweasel.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1083","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/angryweasel.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/angryweasel.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angryweasel.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angryweasel.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1083"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/angryweasel.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1083\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/angryweasel.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1083"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angryweasel.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1083"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angryweasel.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1083"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}