I was checking out test conference programs, and found a list of talk titles I found intriguing (this is a sampling of titles from the conference). I\u2019m curious to know how interesting and innovative you think this conference would be.<\/p>\n
There are definitely a few interesting topics above, and I\u2019d probably attend all of the sessions if I went to the conference. Unfortunately, it\u2019s too late to register, as the conference I pulled these titles from is nearly twelve years old<\/em>.<\/p>\n I\u2019ve complained in the past about the lack of new ideas in testing, but despite a massive amount of idea-regurgitation, I think software testing is edging up on a growth spurt. It takes a bit of \u201ccooking\u201d to come up with new Ideas (good ideas, at least), and two of the biggest ingredients seem to be falling into place.<\/p>\n First off, ideas take time to germinate. Testers are beginning to stay in testing longer (you\u2019ll still see half or more of conference attendees with a year or less of testing experience), but anecdotal information, along with my testing spidey-sense tells me that we have more testers staying in test longer than we did a decade ago. With the experience, comes the ability of these testers to draw on enough experience and experiment long enough to bring new ideas to fruition.<\/p>\n Big ideas are often collisions between smaller ideas. You little tool or approach may not be much on it\u2019s own, and my idea for short-circuiting the fizzbazz is a novelty at best. But when we discover each other\u2019s ideas, a new idea may emerge (use the fizzbazz within your approach to make magic happen). In order to enable these collisions of small ideas, we need people with ideas \u2013 but we need a network to get those ideas to happen. The degrees of separation and the size of networks is massively larger than it was a decade ago. I think testing is ready to foster idea collision on a massive scale.<\/p>\n I could go on, and on\u2026and I will \u2013 but not now. <\/p>\n