Last Word on the A Word

It’s been a busy month. (I blame Xbox One for monopolizing my time), and I’m way overdue for what I meant to be a “day-after” follow up for my last post. If you didn’t read it (or if it’s been so long you’ve forgotten), here’s the summary and where we left off:

  • “Automation” is an overloaded and abused word that often implies that test code only exists to automate human tasks – that’s stupid
  • If you are a tester who codes, you write code. Period. Some of your code may automate tasks. Most will not (or shouldn’t)

Some have asked if I’m against all automation. My tautological answer is that I’m against bad automation. My better answer is, no – I’m not against automating tasks for some testing. Automation is overused and overvalued in software – while the coding of diagnostic and analysis tools is extremely undervalued. In many cases (quick check of basics, some unit tests, monkey testing, etc.), automating a set of user tasks is beneficial and provides a lot of bang for the buck, but focusing entirely on automation of user tasks is a waste of any programmers time.

I wrote a chapter in a test automation book a few years ago, but on principle, I didn’t write about automation. I wrote about a simulation framework that made it easier to write some targeted automation. To me, writing something like this is a great use of a tester’s time – often much better than to write a suite of automated scripts.

The point is, if your testing strategy is entirely to automate a suite of user tasks, you are doing way more to keep “automators” busy than you are actually providing valuable testing. We can debate the goal of the testing activity, but one thing it is not, is the activity of running through a bunch of user tasks over and over. In fact, one of the touted benefits of automation is repeatability – but no user executes the same tasks over and over the exact same way, so writing a bunch of automated tasks to do the the same is often silly.

I’m done writing about automation for now. I may continue to write about code or debugging or testing. My advice for testers is to worry less about “automation”. Ignore it if you can – but at the very least realize how overloaded…and overblown the word is is the software community and take a holistic approach to software testing.

Similar Posts

  • Why?

    Phil Kirkham confirmed his birthright as a tester by asking the epitomical tester question regarding my last post. Why? To be fair, he actually asked: quite a schedule – so what do you get out of it ? Or conversely, if you didn’t go to these events what do you think you would be missing…

  • Five for Friday – March 11, 2022

    Another week gone, and I’m still frustrated with the world around me. Trying to stay positive, but…sheesh. Here’s some stuff worth reading. I’m cheating, but this is worth it. Here is a post highligting seven must-reads for women in tech. I don’t often highlight AB Testing podcasts here, but we had Anne-Marie Charrett on a…

  • Greetings from HYD

    I’m in Hyderabad, India this week to meet with some of our team and to give a handful of presentations at an internal conference. The weather is wonderful this week – it’s warm during the day and cool at night. I got to the hotel around 2:00am Tuesday morning, but got a few hours of…

  • Rockin’ STAR West

    The cat’s out of the bag – I’m popping out of my no-conference bubble, and making an appearance at a testing conference (STAR West in October). The theme of the conference is “Be a Testing Rock star”, and while I think that theme begs for an appearance from Michael Larsen, I’ll do my best to…

4 Comments

  1. I agree with you completely.

    I also believe that the ability to unblock yourself is required to be a productive tester in most environments today. I don’t see enough of that in testing, no matter if it’s a code based test or a bug. I once had to tell a professional tester “Press continue–then keep testing. We KNOW about that bug now.” Most testers just feel excited that it may be a nest of bugs rather than afraid to move on. I’m imagining 3 years of the person freezing until the 1 bug slot they have in their tiny mind is freed up. It’s like chatting back in the modem days! This is not the Highlander of bugs. There can be more than one.

  2. Agree, too many people believe that just because it’s possible to automate, therefore that you should automate. Automated testing has the potential to be a really valuable tool to assist testing, it’s just unfortunate that the majority of the time it’s the equivalent of using a Sonic Screwdriver to hammer in a nail.

    1. Because when all you have is a sonic screwdriver every problem looks like . . . well, it could look like anything, really. 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.