Five for Friday – March 8, 2024

So much cool stuff going on that I’m not even going to talk about the State of the Union speech last night. Instead – slightly less controversial, and more geeky stuff for me to share.

That last editorial aside, this week’s FfF is complete. Have a great weekend, enjoy yourselves, and stay safe (and warm).

Similar Posts

  • Silos, Walls, Teams and TV

    Between Netflix, Amazon Prime, and a busy schedule, I’ve gone without cable television for the last five or so years…up until a month or so ago when I bit the bullet (for a variety of reasons), and added a television package to our existing internet service. It’s working great so far, but the story about…

  • Politics

    I’d like to announce my candidacy for…no – not that kind of politics, I thought I’d drop a few comments on office politics. Too often, people see “politics” as the evil underbelly of the corporate world, and that competency in office politics requires that you can backstab your coworkers with no remorse, find a variety…

  • Five for Friday – June 14, 2019

    I’m reading the Lean Product Playbook – which has this quote (similar to the Poppendiek quote I also frequently mention.As Dave McClure of 500 Startups said, “Customers don’t care about your solution. They care about their problems.” Here’s an article on two of my favorite things – Kanban and Crossing the Chasm – Crossing the…

  • Oops, I Did it Again

    Here’s a story I hear often. The names have been changed to prevent the guilty. Jake had barely taken a sip of his steaming coffee when he saw that thirty-two of the automated tests failed in last night’s test pass. “Crap, I’m slammed today”, thought Jake, “I don’t have time to look at thirty-blanking-two failures”….

  • The Skeptics Dilemma

    For testers, being skeptical is generally a good thing. When someone says, “Our application doesn’t have any reliability errors”, I, for one, am skeptical. I’ll poke and prod and (usually) find something they haven’t thought about. There’s power in skepticism. Last year, I led a team of testers in performing code reviews of production code….

2 Comments

  1. Thanks for the feedback, Alan. I wasn’t sure that anyone else would be as fascinated by punch card tabulators as I was. That’s a part of our roots that I was surprised to see that we hardly ever talk about.

  2. OKRs are just Grove’s Intel’s take on how to do Drucker’s Management By Objectives. That article meanders a bit and says nothing about it.

    A better refutation is from Deming’s perspective. Given your ancient history in testing, it may appeal to you:

    https://colorprocesscontrol.typepad.com/printing_color_process_co/2012/08/a-critical-look-at-management-by-objectives-mbo.html

    This recent conversation in HN applies, too:

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39614752

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.