Five for Friday – March 8, 2024

So much cool stuff going on that I’m not even going to talk about the State of the Union speech last night. Instead – slightly less controversial, and more geeky stuff for me to share.

That last editorial aside, this week’s FfF is complete. Have a great weekend, enjoy yourselves, and stay safe (and warm).

Similar Posts

  • Five for Friday – December 6, 2019

    It’s that time again. Kathy Keating has a great article this week on how Engineering Leaders are Failing Themselves Netflix has open-sourced another interesting tool – Open-Sourcing Metaflow. This is a short and good video summary of one-on-one conversations with remote employees Once again, I’m working my way through Advent of Code – Day 5…

  • An Interlude

    As you may have noticed, I’ve had to take a bit of a break from blogging. I’ve kicked out at least a post or two a week for a few years now, but I’m not dry on ideas, and I definitely want to follow up on my recent Test This post (before a follow up…

  • Five for Friday – October 9, 2020

    Not sure if it’s possible to find anything more interesting than Pence’s fly this week, but I tried. Mike Cohn wrote (yet another) article I enjoyed – this week’s topic asks, Are We Really Bat at Estimating? This twitter thread had some unsurprising thoughts (with some research) on the future of remote work. It’s now…

  • Flashes of (near) fame

    I had a burst of traffic on my blog last week when 10’s of eager internet users stumbled across my little rant fest. I try to avoid traffic for traffic’s sake (past experiences tell me that I could merely comment half-heartedly on any of the sacred subjects of the testing world and generate a significant…

  • See Me…Hear Me

    Although I really enjoy talking about testing, I’m (purposely) speaking a lot less these days. I have a day-job that I love, and I like hanging out in the rainy Pacific Northwest. As of now (and I think a plan change is a long shot), I’m travelling to exactly one conference in CY13 (StarWest in…

2 Comments

  1. Thanks for the feedback, Alan. I wasn’t sure that anyone else would be as fascinated by punch card tabulators as I was. That’s a part of our roots that I was surprised to see that we hardly ever talk about.

  2. OKRs are just Grove’s Intel’s take on how to do Drucker’s Management By Objectives. That article meanders a bit and says nothing about it.

    A better refutation is from Deming’s perspective. Given your ancient history in testing, it may appeal to you:

    https://colorprocesscontrol.typepad.com/printing_color_process_co/2012/08/a-critical-look-at-management-by-objectives-mbo.html

    This recent conversation in HN applies, too:

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39614752

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.